Nine Lessons Learned from the Oikos College Shooting

by Greg Ellifrtiz

On Monday, April 2, a 43 year old man named One L. Goh opened fire in a classroom at Oikos University. Mr. Goh was a former student of the college in California. His rampage resulted in seven people killed and three more wounded. Six of the seven victims killed were women. Most had been shot at point-blank range.

This was a tragic event, but it is not unprecedented and is likely to happen again. Students, parents, police and school employees worldwide need to be prepared for such a crime to occur at anytime, anywhere. School violence is a problem everywhere and can happen in even the "best" of schools.

While it is early in the investigation, we know many of the facts surrounding Monday’s mass killing. This school shooting has many of the same characteristics as past incidents. While it is distasteful to second-guess the actions of the victims in such a horrible atrocity, there are lessons to be learned from their tribulations.

I've scoured the news reports of the Oikos shooting and have condensed the relevant information into a few learning points that may be valuable to anyone who wants to better prepare for the future. I've illustrated the learning points by providing direct quotes from many of the people involved.

Lesson One- Students need to be taught proper responses when a person begins shooting.

In any school shooting the victims have a range of possible responses to consider. In my research on school shootings, the most successful student responses (ranked best to worst) are as follows:

1. Escape
2. Lock down in a secured location
3. Fight the attacker
4. Hide
5. Reason with the attacker
6. Cry, beg, plead, or submit

In the Oikos shooting, different students tried several of the above options with varying success. Let's look at some of the quotes and analyze their responses.

Here we have two initial responses: some students fled while other students complied and begged for their lives. Do you want to guess which ones had the better survival rates? The students who complied with Goh's demands were shot point blank in the chest and head. It is reasonable to assume that these were the majority of the casualties.

There were three people injured (most with arm wounds) as they fled, but the majority who escaped were unharmed.

I see this pattern repeated in almost every school shooting. The students who escape the school by fleeing generally survive. This should be the first option in the instance of school violence. Get out! Only if you can't flee should you consider other options.

When fleeing, it is important to pre-identify secure areas of safety. Instead of blindly fleeing the shooter (and potentially ending up in a worse spot), victims should run toward safety…preferably an area that provides protection from bullets.

Bushes and desks don't provide adequate protection from bullets. The students who chose these hiding spots survived because they got lucky, not because they chose optimal hiding spots. A well prepared student or teacher will pre-identify locations of safety to which they can flee.

One brave student in the incident recognized the gunfire and quickly closed and locked the classroom door. Even though Goh fired several shots through the window in the door, he was unable to make entry and no one in the classroom was injured.

The improvised version of a lockdown was effective here. The keys to its success are the fact that the lockdown was implemented quickly and the fact that the door could be locked from the inside.

While it worked well here, this option has to be placed as a lower priority than escape. Many classroom doors cannot be secured. Before implementing this response, you should know in advance whether your classroom door can be secured or not.

In a longer term event (this was over in just a few minutes), door locks are not likely to keep a determined attacker out.

"I listed “Escape”, “Effective Lockdown”, and “Fighting” in that order as the best actions to take in a school shooting. While it doesn’t seem like anyone fought Mr. Goh in this instance, there were several instances (listed above) when escape and lockdown worked.

Some people might question my ranking of those three options. I often hear from school administrators (concerned about student accountability) recommend lockdown as the best choice. I often hear gun rights advocates and martial artists advocate fighting as the best option. In certain situations, both of groups of people are correct. In others, they are wrong.

I’ve studied school shootings intensively for more than 10 years. I’ve tracked which responses work and which don’t. My recommendations come from detailed analysis, not theoretical musings. Yes, lockdown can work well. But I can give you numerous examples where it failed and resulted in student and teacher deaths.

Armed resistance historically works very well in active shooter events. But how many people are armed in the average school? If we take the option of resistance with firearms out of the equation (which is a reality for the vast majority of the school population), success rates plummet. We also have to discuss the differences between elementary schools and universities. Ten strong college age males might be able to overwhelm an armed attacker, but ten disorganized 1st graders are not as likely to be successful.

Escape works better for the majority of people, and has a proven track record of effectiveness in real-life school shootings that far exceeds the record of any other option listed. I’m not saying that resistance won’t work, or that lockdown is ineffective. Both are viable responses, but their success rates vary tremendously depending on the situation.

When we look at ACTUAL past school shootings, more victims have been saved by escape than any other option. The next greatest number has been saved by an effective lockdown. Resistance is much lower on the list; primarily because the population being targeted (students and teachers) is generally unable to effectively arm themselves due to legal or liability concerns.

Lesson Two- Responding Police Officers and responding citizens need to bring tools to breach barricades on their initial approach.

In most of the recent school shootings (Virginia Tech and Nickel Mines are two prime examples), shooters have sought to increase their body counts by barricading doors to slow police response. While there is no indication that Goh employed this strategy, the "culture of lockdown" currently taught in most schools makes door breaching a mandatory activity.

Even if the shooter doesn't employ barricading tactics, the students will. Police need to respond immediately with everything they need to breach doors. Battering rams, bolt cutters, Halligan tools, shotgun breaching rounds, and pry bars should be carried by the first responding officers. Any delay in police entry will result in more students being killed.

In addition to police being able to breach doors, there should be a protocol in place to assure barricaded students that it is truly the police on the other side of the door. Students may not willingly open barricaded doors if they believe the shooter could still be outside.

In this particular instance, I believe a language barrier (most of the students were immigrants) may have contributed to the problems identified. Schools should adopt some type of "all clear" password or announcement to facilitate rapid evacuation by police and medical personnel.

Lesson Three- Denial Kills

In every school shooting, students and staff initially rationalized the sounds of the gunshots as fireworks, construction noises, or balloons popping. The same thing happened in Oikos.

Students need to be able to recognize the sounds of gunshots for what they are. Even if you are not a hunter or shooter, taking your children to a public shooting range to familiarize them with the sounds of gunfire would be a good idea. Students must be taught to instantly react as soon as they hear gunfire. When they hear that sound in a school they should quickly escape via an exit in the opposite direction from the shots. Any delay in recognizing or reacting to the gunshots will likely result in a higher body count.

Lesson Four- School Shooters plan their attacks thoroughly

Shooters often make very elaborate plans before their attacks. Most have a single goal…a massive number of casualties. Planning is required to ensure that they are able to kill large numbers of people before the police arrive.

This planning is often tough to conceal and may provide the best opportunity to interdict the shooter before he commences firing. Students and school staff should be alert for any indicators that someone is planning to commit a violent act in the school. Don't believe that anyone may be just joking or physically incapable of going through with the shooting. Inform authorities immediately if you have information about the planning of a school attack.

Lesson Five- It isn't about being bullied

The media is quick to rationalize the behavior of school shooters because they are often social outcast or targets of teasing and bullying. That characteristic is generally correct, but most shooters don't start killing people because they were bullied. If so, they would target the bullies themselves. That seldom happens. Most shooters shoot randomly. They may start the action with the goal of killing a specific person, but they very quickly move on to the population as a whole.

In Columbine, one of the first students killed was a boy with Down syndrome who never bullied anyone. The pattern holds true in Oikos as well. When his prime target wasn't available, Goh quickly began shooting everyone he could.

The shooters' motivations are seldom revenge. More often than not they crave notoriety above everything else. They want to be immortalized. We contribute to more shootings with our endless media coverage of such events. It's my opinion that there would be fewer school shootings if the shooters knew they wouldn't get any media coverage.

Lesson Six- School Shootings don’t last long and shooters want to avoid a confrontation with police or armed citizens

Time is of the essence in active shooter events. The average active shooter incident lasts less than four minutes. This statistic holds true in the Oikos shooting as well.

That means that anyone caught up in or responding to such an event must make decisions very quickly. There won't be time for police to form a five-man team to hunt for the killer. There won't be time for anyone inside to run out to their car to get a rifle and their "active shooter bag." It's a "come-as-you-are" event and you will be forced to respond with the tools that you are carrying at the time of the attack.

Take note where these shootings happen…in areas that don't have people carrying guns. As Lt. Col. Dave Grossman says "If the shooter wanted a fight, he would have started shooting up the police station." The shooter doesn't want a fair fight. He wants a massive body count. In order to accomplish his goal, he will target a disarmed population like a school.

History shows that the single worst fear an active shooter has is effective resistance from police or armed citizens foiling his plans for notoriety. In nearly every past event, the shooter has either surrendered or killed himself as soon as he is faced with effective resistance.

The faster we can get the good guys hunting the shooter, the fewer people will be killed.

Lesson Seven- Medical Skills are important

In mass casualty events like any school shooting, medical response will initially be inadequate. It takes some time to muster the resources to effectively care for more than a few patients. Medical response will also be delayed until the scene is safe, meaning that even if the medics are on the scene, they won’t be allowed to enter the building until police are sure the shooting is finished.

You must be prepared to take care of yourself in these cases. Read up on the military's "Tactical Combat Casualty Care" principals. Learn how to treat life threatening bleeding, gunshot wounds to the torso, and blast injuries. The skills to treat these types of injuries are not difficult to learn, but you can't depend on the first aid training you had back when you were a Boy Scout or Lifeguard. Get some updated training.

That is especially true for police officers. Like it or not, you will be forced to handle the initial casualties. Your ability to do that task well will mean the difference between a person living and dying.

Lesson Eight- Recognize Opportunities to act

In almost every recent active shooter event the shooter has taken the time to reload his weapon or clear a malfunction. Many shooters are successfully stopped by their unarmed potential victims who recognize that the shooter's weapon can't fire. Being able to recognize such opportunities gives a victim a chance to make an escape or to attack the shooter.

Do you know how to tell if a gun is empty or malfunctioning? Do your children know? This is critical information. If you don't know how to identify an empty or malfunctioning weapon by sight, have one of your friends who owns guns show you. The information might save your life by giving you an opportunity to act.

Lesson Nine- Future shooters study past events

Killers in the past have studied the success and failures of prior active shooters. They emulate what works and they develop plans to counter the tactics that police have used in previous incidents. It's a constant game of chess between the shooters and police, each side trying to learn lessons from the past.

So what unique factor in the current Oikos College shooting will future shooters emulate? How about this...

This is the first active shooter case of which I am aware when the shooter took the car keys from a dead victim. Goh obviously knew that his fellow students would recognize him and give his identity to the police. Police would be looking for any vehicles registered in his name. Stealing a victim's car is a smart move.

What worries me is that future shooters will study this and think "What other keys can I take?" When they recognize they can kill a teacher, principal, or janitor to get a master key to the building, a new plan will be created.

That simple act will effectively negate a school's entire lockdown process and provide plenty of victims for the next shooter. It's inevitable that this will be part of the next active shooter evolution. Prepared students and school staff should start thinking about how to counter this exigency.

Conclusion

This article is based on the best information I have at the moment. Undoubtedly, some of it will be proven incorrect as further details emerge. We can only do the best we have with the information we have available.

It is my hope that this article will inspire some parents, students, and teachers to better prepare for the next school shooting.

If you would like additional information on school shootings I would recommend that you read my article "A Parent's Guide to School Shootings". Another great resource is Loren Christensen's Book "Surviving School Shootings."

If you have any additional questions, please email me at [email protected] or contact me through my website www.activeresponsetraining.net

About the author:

Greg Ellifritz is the full time firearms and defensive tactics training officer for a central Ohio police department. He holds instructor or master instructor certifications in more than 75 different weapon systems, defensive tactics programs and police specialty areas. Greg has a master's degree in Public Policy and Management and has been an instructor for both the Ohio Peace Officer's Training Academy and the Tactical Defense Institute. He teaches emergency response planning programs to schools through his company Active Response Training.