Judge Strikes Newtown Parents' Suit Against Remington

On October 17, a Connecticut Superior Court judge decided in favor of the Remington Outdoor companies, Camfour Holding and Riverview Sales and struck the amended case brought by some families of the victims in the Sandy Hook School tragedy based on allegations of negligent entrustment.

In the decision, the judge said that the plaintiffs' allegations did not meet the narrow exception for "negligent entrustment" allowed in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) nor did it meet this standard under Connecticut law.

“While the families are obviously disappointed with the judge’s decision, this is not the end of the fight,” Josh Koskoff, the attorney, said in a statement. “We will appeal this decision immediately and continue our work to help prevent the next Sandy Hook from happening.”

"The court ruled as it should in this case," said NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Larry Keane. "We are again reminded of the bulwark that the PLCAA provides the industry against unreasonable litigation of this type even as Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has repeatedly called for its repeal."

You can read the 54-page decision at

http://www.nssf.org/share/PDF/SOTO_v_Bushmaster_Order_Granting_Motion_to...